Prepare ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Question Answers Free Update With 100% Exam Passing Guarantee [Q60-Q78]

NEW QUESTION 60
During a Stage 1 audit, the Quality Manager asks that the audit includes coverage of a new work area they have expanded into since the application was made.
Which of the following two actions should the auditor take?

Advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures.

Advise the Quality Manager that the audit scope has been set and the audit will proceed as planned.

Advise the Quality Manager that, within the existing scope, the new work area can be included without any problem.

Determine whether the Quality Management System covers the new work area and, if so, proceed with the audit.

Suggest that she will advise the programme manager that the audit scope should be revised to include the new work area.

Suggest that the Quality Manager cancels the audit contract and reapplies for the new situation.

NEW QUESTION 61
You are carrying out an audit to ISO 9001 at an organisation which offers regulatory consultancy services to manufacturers of cosmetics.
You are interviewing the Technical Director (TD), who manages a team of regulatory experts responsible for providing regulatory services to customers.
You: “How do you ensure your regulatory team’s competence concerning regulatory requirements is maintained?” TD: “The two Regulatory Experts we employ full-time have years of experience of working in the cosmetics industry.” You: “How is their regulatory competence maintained?” TD: “They are dedicated individuals with lots of contacts in the sector.” You: “How does the business enable them to maintain their understanding of current regulatory requirements?” TD: “We leave that up to them.”

NEW QUESTION 62
You are carrying out an audit at an organisation seeking certification to ISO 9001 for the first time. The organisation offers health and safety training to customers.
You are interviewing the Quality Systems Manager (QSM).
You: “What risks and opportunities have the business identified?”
QSM: “I’1l show you. This was discussed with the Managing Director at the latest management review.” Narrative: The QSM shows you the latest management review record and points to the following table:

You: “How is the business planning to address these risks and opportunities?” QSM: “The MD said that they already knew about them so it was not necessary.”

NEW QUESTION 63
Below are four of the seven principles on which ISO 9000 series are based. Match a potential benefit to each of the quality management principles (QMP).

NEW QUESTION 64
An audit team of three people is conducting a Stage 2 audit to ISO 9001 of an engineering organisation that manufactures sacrificial anodes for the oll and gas industry in marine environments. These are aluminium products designed to prevent corrosion of submerged steel structures. You, as one of the auditors, find that the organisation has shipped anodes for Project DK in the Gulf of Mexico before the galvanic efficiency test results for the anodes have been fully analysed and reported as required by the customer. The Quality Manager explains that the Managing Director authorised release of the anodes to avoid late delivery as penalties would be imposed. The customer was not informed since the tests very rarely fall below the required efficiency. You raise a nonconformity against clause 8.6 of ISO 9001.
Which of the following options for the best description of the nonconformity?

A retrospective concession was not sought from the customer once the test results had been approved by the Quality Manager.

Release of the product without acceptable test results has been accepted by the customer for Project DK.

Products for Project DK have been released before product approval through the quality control process.

The untested product was not recalled until the galvanic efficiency of the anodes was verified.

Clause Reference – ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.6 (Release of Products and Services):ISO 9001 requires that products and services are not released to the customer until:
* All planned verification activities have been completed.
* Acceptance criteria have been met.
* Any necessary approvals have been obtained.
In this scenario:
* The sacrificial anodes for Project DK were shipped before the galvanic efficiency test results were analyzed.
* This constitutes a nonconformity against Clause 8.6 because the products were released without completing the required tests.
Option Analysis:
* A. A retrospective concession was not sought from the customer once the test results had been approved by the Quality Manager:Incorrect. While obtaining a concession might mitigate the situation, the nonconformity pertains to the process failure of releasing the products without completing required tests, not the absence of a concession.
* B. Release of the product without acceptable test results has been accepted by the customer for Project DK:Incorrect. The customer was not informed before the release, and there is no indication that this was accepted beforehand. Furthermore, ISO 9001 requires planned processes to be followed, regardless of later acceptance.
* C. Products for Project DK have been released before product approval through the quality control process:Correct. This description accurately reflects the nonconformity. The quality control process required test results to be analyzed and verified before release, which did not happen.
* D. The untested product was not recalled until the galvanic efficiency of the anodes was verified:
Incorrect. The issue is not about recalling the product but about releasing it without completing the required tests. Recalling the product is not mentioned in the scenario.
Why C is Correct:
* The nonconformity is a clear breach of Clause 8.6, where the products were released without meeting the planned verification requirements.
* This demonstrates a failure in adhering to quality control processes, which is a critical aspect of ISO
9001 compliance.
Key ISO 9001 Reference:
* Clause 8.6: Products and services shall not be released to the customer until all planned activities (e.g., testing) have been satisfactorily completed, or the customer has approved the release with knowledge of deviations.

NEW QUESTION 65
Match the process descriptions below to the process names:

NEW QUESTION 66
The following are stages of an audit, put them in the order they would be conducted.

Explanation:
Establishing the audit programme objectives
Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities
Establishing the audit programme
Initiating the audit
Preparing all audit activity
Conducting the audit activities
According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 5, the audit programme is a set of one or more audits planned for a specific time frame and directed towards a specific purpose. The audit programme includes all activities necessary to plan, organize, and conduct the audits. The audit programme management involves the following steps1:
Establishing the audit programme objectives: The audit programme objectives define the intended outcomes of the audit programme, such as verifying conformity, evaluating performance, identifying improvement opportunities, etc. The audit programme objectives should be aligned with the strategic direction and policies of the organization and the needs and expectations of the interested parties.
Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities: The audit programme risks and opportunities are the factors that can affect the achievement of the audit programme objectives, such as changes in the internal or external context, availability of resources, competence of auditors, etc. The audit programme risks and opportunities should be identified, analyzed, and evaluated to determine the appropriate actions to address them.
Establishing the audit programme: The audit programme is established by defining the audit programme scope, criteria, methods, and resources. The audit programme scope defines the extent and boundaries of the audit programme, such as the processes, functions, sites, activities, etc. that will be audited. The audit programme criteria are the set of policies, procedures, or requirements used as a reference for the audits. The audit programme methods are the techniques used to conduct the audits, such as interviews, observations, document review, sampling, etc. The audit programme resources are the human, technical, and financial resources needed to implement the audit programme.
Initiating the audit: The audit initiation is the process of formally establishing the arrangements for an individual audit within the audit programme. The audit initiation involves contacting the auditee and the audit client, confirming the audit objectives, scope, and criteria, and obtaining the necessary information and access for the audit.
Preparing all audit activity: The audit preparation is the process of developing the audit plan and the audit work documents for an individual audit. The audit plan is a document that provides the basis for agreement regarding the conduct of the audit, such as the audit schedule, the audit team, the audit methods, the audit language, the audit report, etc. The audit work documents are the records that provide evidence of the audit activities, such as the audit checklist, the audit notes, the audit findings, etc.
Conducting the audit activities: The audit activities are the processes of collecting and verifying audit evidence and evaluating it against the audit criteria to make the audit conclusions. The audit activities include the opening meeting, the communication during the audit, the roles and responsibilities of the audit team and the auditee, the audit evidence collection and verification, the audit findings generation and recording, the closing meeting, and the audit report preparation and distribution.
References: ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION 67
An audit team of three people is conducting a Stage 2 audit to ISO 9001 of an engineering organisation that manufactures sacrificial anodes for the oil and gas industry in marine environments. These are aluminium products designed to prevent corrosion of submerged steel structures. You, as one of the auditors, find that the organisation has shipped anodes for Project DK in the Gulf of Mexico before the galvanic efficiency test results for the anodes have been fully analysed and reported as required by the customer. The Quality Manager explains that the Managing Director authorised the release of the anodes to avoid late delivery as penalties would be Imposed. The customer was not informed since the tests very rarely fall below the required efficiency. You raise a nonconformity against clause 8.6 of ISO 9001.
At the Closing meeting, the audit team leader presents the findings of the audit and comes to the above nonconformity. The Quality Manager produces the test report for Project DK, which shows an acceptable galvanic efficiency, and presents an email from the customer confirming acceptance of the anodes. He asks that the nonconformity be withdrawn.
Which two of the following responses by the audit team leader would be acceptable?

Accept the Quality Manager’s request without reviewing the documentation.

Advise management that the information provided will be reviewed at the audit follow-up stage.

Ask the auditor (you) who raised the issue, to state what you think should happen

Indicate that the nonconformity is evidence of a system failure that needs to be rectified.

Refuse to accept the documentation produced and maintain the nonconformity.

Thank the Quality Manager for his contribution but dismiss the information as irrelevant after a quick review.

NEW QUESTION 68
During a third-party audit of a pharmaceutical organisation (CD9000) site of seven COVID-19 testing laboratories in various terminals at a major international airport, you interview the CD 9000’s General Manager (GM), who was accompanied by Jack, the legal compliance expert. Jack is acting as the guide in the absence of the Technical Manager due to him contracting COVID-19.
You: “What external and internal issues have been identified that could affect CD9000 and its quality management system?” GM: “Jack guided us on this. We identified issues like probable competition of another laboratory organisation in the airport, legal requirements on COVID-19 continuously changing, the shortage of competent laboratory analysists, the epidemic declining soon, shortage of chemicals for the analysis. It was quite a good experience.” You: “Did you document these issues?” GM: “No. Jack said that ISO 9001 does not require us to document these issues.” You: “How did you determine the risks associated with the issues and did you plan actions to address them?” GM: “I am not sure. The Technical Manager is responsible for this process. Jack may be able to answer this question in his absence.” Select two options for how you would respond to the General Manager’s suggestion:

I would not accept the legal compliance expert answering the question.

I would ask to audit the Technical Manager by phone.

I would delay the audit until the return of the technical manager

I would look for evidence that the actions resulting from the risk assessment had been taken.

I would ask for a different guide instead of the legal compliance expert.

I would ask the consultant to leave the meeting since he is not an employee of the organisation.

According to clause 4.1 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and its strategic direction and that affect its ability to achieve the intended results of its quality management system. The organization should monitor and review these issues and update them as necessary. Although the standard does not explicitly require documented information of these issues, it does require documented information as evidence of the implementation of the actions taken to address risks and opportunities, as per clause 6.1. The organization should also retain documented information as evidence of the results of the monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation of its QMS, as per clause 9.1. Therefore, the auditor should not accept the legal compliance expert answering the question, as he is not the person responsible for the process and may not have the necessary competence or knowledge of the QMS. The auditor should also look for evidence that the actions resulting from the risk assessment had been taken, as this is a requirement of the standard and a way to verify the effectiveness of the QMS. The other options are not appropriate courses of action for the auditor, because they do not address the audit objective or criteria, or they may compromise the audit integrity or impartiality. For example, option B may not be feasible or reliable, as the Technical Manager may not be available or able to provide the necessary evidence by phone. Option C may cause unnecessary delay and inconvenience for the audit process and the auditee. Option E may not solve the problem, as the guide is not the main source of evidence or information for the audit. Option F may be disrespectful or unprofessional, as the consultant may have a legitimate role or interest in the audit.
References: ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Context of the Organization, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Audit Evidence

NEW QUESTION 69
Which two of the following are the key expected results of a quality management system that conforms to the requirements of ISO 9001:2015?

Consistently provide products that meet customers’ requirements

Decreased number of management system nonconformities

Decreased number of warranty claims

Decreased number of nonconforming products in all stages of the manufacturing cycle

Enhanced customer satisfaction

Increased profits

NEW QUESTION 70
Match the process descriptions below to the process names:

NEW QUESTION 71
You are carrying out an audit at a single-site organisation seeking certification to ISO 9001 for the first time.
The
organisation manufactures cosmetics for major retailers and the name of the retailer supplied appears on the product packaging. Sales turnover has increased significantly over the past five years. The organisation uses a software programme called SWIFT, which is used to record sales, plan production, purchase supplies, print despatch notes, track new product development, perform traceability exercises, carry out mass balance checks, raise invoices, create budgets, and support financial control.
You are nearing the end of the audit and you are reviewing your audit notes. You notice a recurring trend concerning the SWIFT database as shown below:

You ask the Quality Manager to explain how the SWIFT database is controlled. You learn that the Operations Director is responsible for determining and progressing SWIFT software updates. You decide to meet the Operations Director (OD).
You: “Good afternoon.”
OD: “Good afternoon.”
You: “What responsibility do you have concerning the SWIFT database?”
OD: “I maintain it. If anyone wishes to propose an update to the database, they send me an email with details of their proposal. I then either process the database update myself, or I send the request to the consultant who designed the database 20 years ago. The necessary software changes are made, and the amended software is immediately released to users.” You: “Would you explain how the software amendments are controlled?” OD: “Of course. I personally update every computer myself.” You: “Do you inform the database users of the changes?” OD: “No I don’t. They find out for themselves by using the software, or they come to see me if they have any questions.” You: “How do you ensure that the database users use the latest version?” OD: “That’s easy, I update every computer myself.” You: “During the audit, I noted there were several versions of SWIFT in use (you refer to your audit notes).” OD: “I know. That’s because some versions work better than others, and depending on user needs and experiences, we allow users to revert to using an earlier version if they find it works better for them.” Based on the scenario, which two of the following statements are true? There is evidence of nonconformity with a requirement defined in …

clause 7.1.3 Infrastructure

clause 7.1.4 Environment for the operation of processes

clause 7.5.1 Documented information – General

clause 7.5.2 Documented information – Creating and updating

clause 7.5.3 Control of documented information

NEW QUESTION 72
For a third-party, match the Activity with the Responsibility for conducting it.

Explanation:

* Approve Certification Body: Accreditation Body
* Award certification: Certification Body
* Recommend certification: Audit Team Leader
* Maintain certification:
Comprehensive Detailed ExplanationIn the context of a third-party ISO 9001 audit, different entities play specific roles in the certification process. Here’s a detailed explanation of the responsibilities:
* Approve Certification Body: Accreditation BodyThe Accreditation Body is responsible for approving Certification Bodies. Accreditation Bodies are independent entities that evaluate the competence of Certification Bodies, ensuring they meet international standards like ISO/IEC 17021, which sets out the criteria for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. In this role, they confirm that the Certification Body is capable of conducting ISO 9001 audits and granting certifications in accordance with international guidelines.
* Award Certification: Certification BodyThe Certification Body is the entity that ultimately awards the certification to an organization after verifying that it meets the ISO 9001 standards. Certification Bodies conduct audits, either directly or through a team of auditors, and based on the audit outcomes, they issue the certification, indicating that the organization complies with ISO 9001.
* Recommend Certification: Audit Team LeaderThe Audit Team Leader is responsible for leading the audit and making a recommendation to the Certification Body. This recommendation is based on the audit findings-whether the organization meets the ISO 9001 requirements or if there are areas of non- compliance that need corrective action. The final decision on certification is not made by the Audit Team Leader but by the Certification Body.
* Maintain Certification: Certification BodyMaintaining certification refers to the ongoing process of ensuring that an organization continues to comply with ISO 9001 requirements. The Certification Body conducts regular surveillance audits (e.g., annually) and may also perform recertification audits (typically every three years). This ongoing monitoring ensures that the certified organization continues to adhere to the quality management standards over time.
This breakdown clearly assigns responsibility based on the defined roles of Accreditation Bodies, Certification Bodies, and Audit Teams in the ISO 9001 certification process.

NEW QUESTION 73
Which one of the following documents addresses audit time calculation for third-party certification audits?

ISO 17021-1

ISO 19011

ISO 9000

ISO 9001

NEW QUESTION 74
You are carrying out an annual audit at an organisation that has been certificated to ISO 9001 for two years.
The organisation offers home security
services. The scope of the quality management system covers alarm installation, alarm servicing, alarm monitoring and response. The business operates from a single office and employs subcontract installers and service technicians across the country.
You have just completed the opening meeting. You are interviewing the Managing Director (MD).
You: “I would like to gain an understanding of how the quality management system has been supporting your business and its strategic direction.” MD: “We are continuing to face difficult times. The market is extremely competitive, and customers typically look for the least expensive option when choosing home security services. We have not yet seen any business benefit from our quality management system.” You: “Tell me how you determine external and internal issues.” MD: “We use SWOT analysis (Strengths Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats).” You: “How have the outputs from your SWOT been used?” Select two of the following audit trails would you take to explore the extent to which the SWOT analysis and the outputs from this have been used to enable the business to achieve the intended results(s) of its quality management system according to ISO 9001.

Establish how many interested parties need to be consulted

Establish how the organisation reviews information about external and internal issues

Establish how the organisation shares information with external interested parties

Establish what actions were taken to improve the QMS

Establish whether the SWOT analysis has been reviewed by the procurement manager

Establish whether the SWOT analysis is focussed solely on the QMS

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 4.1, the organisation must determine the external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that affect its ability to achieve the intended results of its quality management system. The organisation must also monitor and review the information about these issues. SWOT analysis is a tool that can help the organisation to identify its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. However, the SWOT analysis alone is not sufficient to comply with the requirement, as the organisation also needs to review the information periodically and update it as necessary. Therefore, one audit trail would be to establish how the organisation reviews information about external and internal issues, such as how often, by whom, using what criteria, and with what results. 123 According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 10.3, the organisation must continually improve the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the quality management system. The organisation must also consider the results of analysis and evaluation, and the outputs from management review, to determine if there are any needs or opportunities for improvement. SWOT analysis can help the organisation to identify the areas where improvement is needed or possible, such as addressing the weaknesses and threats, or exploiting the strengths and opportunities. However, the SWOT analysis alone is not sufficient to comply with the requirement, as the organisation also needs to take actions to implement the improvement, such as setting objectives, allocating resources, assigning responsibilities, and evaluating the effectiveness. Therefore, another audit trail would be to establish what actions were taken to improve the QMS, such as what, when, by whom, how, and with what results. 124 References:
1: ISO 9001:2015 – Quality management systems – Requirements
2: Advisera, “Context of the organization in ISO 9001:2015 explained”, https://advisera.com/9001academy
/knowledgebase/how-to-identify-the-context-of-the-organization-in-iso-90012015/
3: ISO Templates, “ISO 9001 – Clause 4: Context of the organisation explained”, https://resources.iso- templates.com/blog/iso-9001-clause-4-context-of-the-organisation-explained
4: Advisera, “How to implement continual improvement in ISO 9001”, https://advisera.com/9001academy
/knowledgebase/how-to-implement-continual-improvement-in-iso-9001/

NEW QUESTION 75
Which one of the following is not an ISO 9000:2015 quality management principle?

Evidence-based decision-making

Leadership

Process approach

Risk-based approach

NEW QUESTION 76
Select the term which best describes the quality management system process of modifying a non-conforming product to bring it within acceptance criteria.

Concession

Correction

Corrective action

Preventive action

NEW QUESTION 77
Put the following steps of a third-party audit into the correct sequence in which they happen.

Explanation:
Sequence:
Stage 1 Audit
Stage 2 Opening Meeting
Interviews
Stage 2 Closing Meeting
Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings
Issue Certificate
Surveillance Audit
Follow-up Audit
To complete the sequence, you can drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.
Here is a brief explanation of each step:
Stage 1 Audit: This is the initial audit that aims to assess the readiness of the organization for the stage 2 audit. It involves reviewing the documentation of the quality management system, evaluating the scope and objectives of the audit, and identifying any major gaps or nonconformities34.
Stage 2 Opening Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the start of the stage 2 audit. It involves confirming the audit plan, the audit criteria, the audit scope, and the audit team. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to ask any questions or raise any concerns34.
Interviews: This is the main activity of the stage 2 audit, where the audit team collects evidence by interviewing the personnel involved in the quality management system, observing the processes and activities, and examining the records and documents. The audit team uses various techniques, such as sampling, measurement, analysis, and evaluation, to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system345.
Stage 2 Closing Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the end of the stage 2 audit. It involves presenting the audit findings, the audit conclusions, and the audit report to the auditee. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to provide feedback, ask questions, or dispute any findings34.
Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings: This is the process of verifying that the auditee has taken appropriate corrective actions to address any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement identified during the stage
2 audit. The audit team may request evidence or conduct a follow-up visit to confirm the effectiveness of the corrective actions34.
Issue Certificate: This is the process of issuing a certificate of conformity to the auditee, if the audit team is satisfied that the quality management system meets the requirements of the standard and that there are no major nonconformities or unresolved issues. The certificate is valid for a specified period, usually three years, and is subject to periodic surveillance audits34.
Surveillance Audit: This is the process of conducting periodic audits, usually once a year, to monitor the continued conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system. It involves reviewing the changes, improvements, and performance of the quality management system, and identifying any new nonconformities or opportunities for improvement34.
Follow-up Audit: This is the process of conducting an additional audit, usually in response to a significant change, a complaint, or a major nonconformity, to verify the impact and the corrective actions taken by the auditee. It may result in the suspension, withdrawal, or renewal of the certificate, depending on the outcome of the audit34.

NEW QUESTION 78
You are carrying out an audit at a single-site organisation seeking certification to ISO 9001 for the first time.
The organisation manufactures
cosmetics for major retailers.
You are interviewing the Manufacturing Manager (MM).
You: “I would like to begin by looking at the cleaning controls.”
MM: “We record the cleaning of the equipment at the end of every batch. This document details the minimum cleaning frequency and the procedures to follow for all areas and each item of equipment. The person who carries out the cleaning puts their initial on the document and records the time and date alongside.” Narrative: You sample production records over 3-days and note down evidence of nonconformity as per the table below.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply